Research Article

The Experience with the Use of Nandrolone Decanoate and Pyritinol in Children with Cerebral Palsy

 

Aamir Jalal Al-Mosawi1,2*

1Advisor in Pediatrics and Pediatric Psychiatry, Children Teaching Hospital of Baghdad Medical City, Iraq

2Head, Iraq Headquarter of Copernicus Scientists International Panel, Baghdad, Iraq

 

Received Date: 12/06/2020; Published Date: 06/07/2020

 

*Corresponding author: Aamir Jalal Al-Mosawi, Advisor in Pediatrics and Pediatric Psychiatry, Children Teaching Hospital of Baghdad Medical City,Head, Iraq Headquarter of Copernicus Scientists International Panel, Baghdad, Iraq

 DOI: 10.46718/JBGSR.2020.02.000051

Cite this article: Aamir Jalal Al-Mosawi, The Experience with the Use of Nandrolone Decanoate and Pyritinol in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Op Acc J Bio Sci & Res 2(4)-2020.

Abstract

      Background: Cerebral palsy is a heterogeneous disorder resulting from a non-progressive damage to the developing brain that cause mostly a variable degree of chronic motor disability and developmental abnormalities during early childhood including delayed speech and motor development. Because of the heterogeneous nature of the condition and variable severity and presentations, patients are generally treated with an individualized treatment plans that provides a combination of interventions including treatment of spasticity with muscle relaxants and physical therapy. Patients with severe condition can have significant disability, while patients with less severe disorder experience delay in motor developments and learning difficulties. The aim of this paper is to describe retrospectively our experience with use of nandrolone decanoate (ND) and pyritinol in children with a less severe form of cerebral palsy with aim of improving motor functions and learning abilities.

      Patients and Methods: Five patients (3 males and 2 girls) with cerebral palsy presenting mainly with spasticity, hyperreflexia and delayed speech and motor development. The patients were treated with intermittent low dose intra-muscular (i.m) injections of ND (12.5 mg for children under 2 years, 25 mg for the older child) with the aim of improving their delayed motor development. Pyritinol was used in the one patient in addition to ND with aim of improving his learning abilities. Estimation of the bone age was made using radiographs of the left wrist before the injection and 2 weeks after each injection. The patient was monitored weekly for the development of hypertension and sign of virilization. All the patients had normal or delayed bone age before treatment.

     Results: The use of nandrolone decanoate intramuscular injections and pyritinol was associated with dramatic effect on the motor development and learning abilities respectively without the occurrence of any adverse effects. Mild advancement of bone age was noticed only in one patient.

        Conclusion: nandrolone decanoate and pyritinol can be useful in the management of cerebral palsy.

 

Keywords: Cerebral palsy, Development, Nandrolone, Pyritinol.

Introduction

Cerebral palsy is a heterogeneous disorder resulting from a non-progressive damage to the developing brain that cause mostly a variable degree of chronic motor disability and developmental abnormalities during early childhood including delayed speech and motor development. Because of the heterogeneous nature of the condition and variable severity and presentations, patients are generally treated with an individualized treatment plans that provides a combination of interventions including treatment of spasticity with muscle relaxants and physical therapy. Patients with severe condition can have significant disability, while patients with less severe disorder experience delay in motor developments and learning difficulties [1-3]. The aim of this paper is to describe retrospectively our experience with use of nandrolone decanoate (ND) and pyritinol in children with a less severe form of cerebral palsy with aim of improving motor functions and learning abilities.

Patient and Method

Five patients (3 males and 2 girls) with cerebral palsy presenting mainly with spasticity, hyperreflexia and delayed motor development. Three patients aged 14 months (patients 1, 2, and 2), one patient aged 13 months (Patient-4), and one patient aged 9 years. Patients 1 and 2 had poor sucking and feeding during the first week of life and developed physiological jaundice, and the mother of patient 2 had Mother was anemic during pregnancy & received intramuscular iron and antibiotics for gynecological infections.


The patients under two years had delayed language development and were not saying any word with meaning. Three of patients under two years had good fine motor movements as indicated by good pencil grasp and eating biscuit alone. The condition in three patients was related to birth asphyxia, while two patients were considered to have cerebral palsy of undetermined etiology. None of the patients had family history of any neurological disorders. Table 1 summarizes the patients’ characteristics and clinical findings before treatment.  The patients were treated with intermittent low dose intra-muscular (i.m) injections of ND (12.5mg for children under 2 years, 25mg for the older child) with the aim of improving their delayed motor development. Pyritinol was used in the older patient (Patient-5) in addition to ND with aim of improving his learning abilities. Estimation of the bone age was made using radiographs of the left wrist before the injection and 2 weeks after each injection. The patient was monitored weekly for the development of hypertension and sign of virilization. All the patients had normal or delayed bone age before treatment. All the patients had normal brain CT-scan.  Signed consent was obtained from parents/guardians prior to enrollment and the study was approved by the Scientific Committee of Iraq Headquarter of Copernicus Scientists International Panel.

 

Table 1: The patients’ characteristics and clinical findings before treatment.

 

Results

The use of ND and pyritinol was associated with dramatic effect on the motor development and learning abilities respectively without the occurrence of any adverse effects. Mild advancement of bone age was noticed only in one patient. Table 2 summarizes the treatment of each patient and their effects.

Table 2: The treatment of each patients and their effects.

Discussion

The cautious and judicious, but safe use of nandrolone decanoate has recently been reported to have some benefit in the treatment of patients with cerebral palsy, refractory vitamin D-resistant rickets, and achondroplasia. In contrast to 17- testosterone derivatives, nandrolone esters do not cause sodium sulfobromophthalein retention; therefore hepatic complications are infrequent with their use in ordinary doses for short periods. The use of nandrolones has been reported to be associated with beneficial positive effects such as muscle strengthening.

 

The intermittent judicious use can help in avoiding the main risk of premature epiphyseal closure and any possible unnecessary virilization. Nandrolone is less virilizing than other anabolic steroids and have been used in women. In contrast to 17-α testosterone derivative, nandrolone esters do not cause sodium sulfobromophthalein retention; therefore hepatic complications are infrequent with their use in ordinary doses for short periods [4,5]. It has been shown that cerebral blood supply is increased by pyritinol resulting in an improvement of nerve cell metabolism, and it was used with benefit in idiopathic mental retardation [6]. Successful management of difficult neurological disorders demands careful balancing of the possible unwanted side-effects associated with persistent injudicious use as it may be useful to obtain the benefits of such agents through appropriately skilled use. 

Conclusion

The use of nandrolone and pyritinol in this study was found to have a beneficial effect on motor development without the occurrence of unwanted effects or advancement of bone age. 

References

1. Al-Mosawi AJ (2019) New therapies for the treatment of spastic cerebral palsy (1st edn), LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken, Germany.

2. Al-Mosawi AJ (2019) The pattern of cerebral palsy in Iraqi children. (1st edn), LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken, Germany.

3. Al-Mosawi AJ (2019) New Therapies for the treatment of spastic cerebral palsy. Med J Clin Trials Case Stud 3(2): 000209.

4. Al-Mosawi AJ (2005) Experience with refractory vitamin D-resistant rickets and non-17α alkyl testosterone derivative anabolic agent. Therapy (Clinical practice) 2(1):91-94.

5. Al-Mosawi AJ (2006) Dramatic effect of non-17 alpha alkyl testosterone derivative anabolic agent on growth in a child with achondroplasia on the short term. Therapy (Clinical practice) 3(5): 605-607.
6. Al-Mosawi AJ (2018) A novel therapeutic approach for idiopathic mental retardation. (1st edn), LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken, Germany.

Mechanical ventilators control either gas flow (volume control) or airway pressure (pressure control) for the inspiratory period. Dual control modes are designed to combine the constant minute ventilation of volume control ventilation and the fast variable current advantages of pressure control ventilation. All dual control modes provide pressure controlled breath using pressure limit and descending flow model. The volume produced varies depending on the patient's effort and pulmonary impedance. In the dual control mode, unlike the pressure control mode, the output is changed according to the measured input (volume). Dual control modes can be patient or time triggered, current or time cycled.

 

Dual Control modes allow you to set the volume target while the ventilator is pressure controlled breathing. In dual-in-breath mode, the ventilator switches from volume control to volume control, according to the patient's inspiratory effort and ability to reach the set minimum tidal volume, within the same breath. While the device is working in pressure support (PS) or pressure control (PC) mode in breathless dual control mode, with the operation of the feedback ring, it decreases or increases the pressure limit to provide the tidal volume set by the clinician. 

TOP