Review Article
Skin Toxicities of Immune Check Point Inhibitors in Solid Tumors and Managment:Review of Literature
Mohamed réda KHMAMOUCHE, Choukri Elmhadi1, Tarik Mahfoud, Rachid Tanz, Lamiaa Amaadour, Aziz Bazine, Mohamed Fetohi, Nawfel Mellas and Mohamed Ichou
Medical oncology department, Military Hospital Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco.
Medical oncology department, Hassan II University Hospital, University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Fes, Morocco.
Medical oncology department, Military Hospital Moulay Ismail, Meknes, Morocco.
Received Date: 20/10/2021; Published Date: 29/10/2021
*Corresponding author: Mohamed réda Khmamouche, Medical oncology department, Military Hospital Mohammed V, Rabat, Hassan II University Hospital, University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Fes, Morocco
DOI: 10.46718/JBGSR.2021.10.000236
Cite this article: Mohamed réda KHMAMOUCHE, Choukri Elmhadi, Tarik Mahfoud, Rachid Tanz, Lamiaa Amaadour, Aziz Bazine, Mohamed Fetohi, Nawfel Mellas and Mohamed Ichou. Skin Toxicities of Immune Check Point Inhibitors in Solid Tumors and Managment: Review of Literature
ABSTRACT
Skin toxicities are the most prevalent immune-related adverse events. Various reactions have been reported few weeks after initiation treatment by immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this review, we summarized the clinicopathologic manifestations of different lesions and principles of their management .
Keywords: Skin toxicities, pruritis, immune check point inhibitors, adverse events.
Introduction
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently used in the treatment of several cancers in adjuvant and metastatic situations such as melanoma , classical Hodgkin disease, urothelial carcinomas, non small cell lung cancers , renal clear cell carcinomas, Merkel cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma due to their inhibitory effects on cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA4) or anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD1) and its ligand (anti PDL-1) [1].
The most frequent immune related adverse events affect skin, endocrine organs, colon, liver and lungs. However, very serious lesions, even lethal, such as neurological disorders and myocarditis are rare [2-6].
Among the most frequently described cutaneous side effects in the literature, pruritus is frequently reported as a side effect of these treatments [7,8], followed by rush and vitiligo [2]. Other toxicities have been reported more rarely with checkpoint inhibitors: alopecia areata, stomatitis, xerosis cutis , psoriasis and photosensitivity [9,10]. The principal aim of this review is to describe skin lesions in patients treated with ICIs for solid tumors and to discuss the principles of their therapeutic management.
Material & Methods
A bibliographic search was carried out in different databases, highlighting PUBMED, SCIENCE DIRET, SCIELO, OVID, SCHOLAR GOOGLE, from 2015 to 2021 our keywords were: antibodies, Covid-19, Pregnant, Lactating, Vaccines. The initial results showed a total of 125 studies, of which those works published in any language other than English or Spanish and those that did not have full text available were excluded, thus we have a total of 15 articles for our review, highlighting reviews , meta-analysis, clinical trials, systematic reviews, later the studies found were read, which describes physiological and anatomical aspects in pregnancy, the physiology of the maternal-fetal immune response, the different mechanisms with which vaccines generate antibodies and how these antibodies can be transmitted from mother to infant.
Different ICIs used in treatment of cancers
Immune checkpoint therapy affects the anti-tumor immune response at the level of T cell activation by antigen presenting cells (APCs). The CTLA-4 protein is expressed on T cells, and competes with CD28 for linking up to B7 [11]. It is thus a competitive inhibitor of T cell activation. Pharmacologic CTLA-4 inhibition increases binding of CD28 to B7 and there by promotes T cell activation [11].
T cells also express the Programmed Death 1 receptor (PD-1), which is activated by PD ligands 1 and 2 (PD-L1 and PD-L2) to decrease T cell activation by inhibiting proliferation, decreasing cytokine production, and promoting apoptosis [11]. ICIs are medications that act at the level of T cell costimulation to increase immune activation, with the goal of promoting an anti-tumor immune response. All ICIs are monoclonal antibodies. Ipilimumab is the lone FDA-approved inhibitor of CTLA-4 [12]. However, there is a number of FDA approved PD-1 inhibitors : nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Combination CTLA-4 and anti PD-1 has been shown to be more effective than monotherapy ; but, combination therapy may be substantially more toxic, and needs to select carefully patients [13].
The first use of ICI to achieve true remissions in metastatic melanoma was obtained with ipililumab. Inhibition of the PD-1 axis has found application in the treatment of a variety of solid tumors. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab are both approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and other solid tumors and hematologic malignancies [13]. Cemiplimab is a new PD-1 inhibitor developed and is approved specifically for metastatic or unresectable squamous cell carcinoma [14]. In addition, atezolizumab, durvalumab and avelumab are PD-L1 inhibitors, approved for the treatment of many solid tumors including small and non-small cell lung cancers, urothelial carcinoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma [13]. The names of the main ICIs approved by the FDA , and their indications are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1: FDA approved ICI and their indications.
Grading of immune cutaneous adverse events
Adverse events can be classified by grades based on the degree of severity and associated morbidity. It is according The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Familiarity with the CTCAE grading system is important in communicating with a patient’s oncology team and dermatologist. Depending the severity of cutaneous toxicity, we can grade maculopapular eruptions and bullous lesions on four grades: Macules/papules or blisters covering <10% BSA is defined Grade1, grade 2 if covering 10 to 30% BSA, and >30% is defined grade 3. Any life-threatening cutaneous toxicity is considered grade 4 [13-15].
Skin Immunorelated Adverse Events
Skin toxicities are the most common complications reported of ICI therapy and the earliest to occur. Many cutaneous irAEs present similarly to primary dermatoses and may share properties with autoimmune skin disorders [13]. Fortunately, these cutaneous adverse events are typically mild, and can usually be managed without interruption of immunotherapy [13].
The incidences of all-grade dermatologic immuno related adverse events range from 17% to 40% for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and 37% to 70% for ipilimumab, while grade 3 or higher cutaneous toxicities are found in 1% to 3% of patients treated with ICIs [16-18].
There is a difference cutaneous toxicities between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and CTLA-4 inhibitors. Psoriasis, pemphigoid, and cutaneous sarcoidosis were mainly reported with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, whereas Sweet syndrome and erythema nodosum were almost exclusively observed with CTLA-4 inhibitors [19]. The most common side effect reported with ICIs is pruritus (7, 8), with an estimated incidence between 11 and 47% [10,20]. Pruritus, in the absence of rash occurs in 11 to 18% of patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors and up to 30% of patients treated with anti-CTLA-4 inhibitors [7,21,22]. Pruritus can deeply affect quality of life of patients and may lead to treatment discontinuation. However, physiopathology and etiology of ICI-related pruritus has been unknown [1].
Pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, and cemiplimab were caused pruritus in Salinas study [1]. It’s appeared after a mean of 8.1 months after ICIs initiation treatment and it was diffuse in 48 % of cases [1]. It is essentiel to consider prodromal bullous pemphigoid in the evaluation of severe and refractory pruritus. Patients are generally treated with topical anti-pruritics such as camphor-menthol ,topical steroids, anti-histamines, and occasionally other anti-pruritic drugs such as pregabalin or gabapentin, opioid antagonists such as naloxone and naltrexone, and the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant; phototherapy can also used [13,22,23]. The treatment prescribed for patients who present pruritus was emollients, antihistamines and topical steroids with favorable evolution of symptomatology [1]. Other skin diseases reported in this study in order of frequency of occurrence in 21.5% of cases were: vitiligo, eczema, maculopapular exanthema, psoriasis lichen, and folliculitis and urticaria [1].
Only severe and debilitating cases of pruritus require discontinuation of immunotherapy and systemic steroids [23]. Cutaneous rash is reported in 24% of the patients treated with ipilimumab, in 15% of those receiving anti-PD-1 and in 40% with the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab [24,25]. Vitiligo is observed in about 8% of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 or with the combination of checkpoint inhibitors, but is rarely with ipilimumab alone [26]. The evaluation of severity of skin adverse events must be careful by the physicians and needs physical examination including the mucosal areas, and appreciation of the general status of the patient (fever, ...), and if needed, a biological checkup [2].
It is important to eliminate the possibility of a dermatological emergency such as drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis (Sweet syndrome), Stevens- Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). In these life-threatening situations, the treatment with ICIs should be definitively discontinued, the patient necessit emergency hospitalisation, and symptomatic treatment should be initiated immediately by a dermatologist [2].
Management of Cutaneous rash
For grade 1 (mild) :Macular or papular eruption ,asymptomatic lesions
Treatment by immunotherapy can be continued and symptoms can be treated with topical steroids, oral antihistamines.
For grade 2 (moderate) : Pruritic symptoms ≤ 50% of skin surface
treatment with immunotherapy drugs can be continued but should be checked weekly for improvement. If not resolved, treatment should be discontinued until the skin lesions has reverted to grade 1. Symptomatic treatment consists of topical steroid cream, oral antihistamines and oral steroids: prednisolone 1mg/kg/day x 3-7 days-max: 60mg/day or equivalent depending on severity and extent of rash. If the symptoms persist more than 5 days or worse or relapse, we omit the next dose of immunotherapy and we start oral corticosteroid therapy, if not commenced already and topical emollient . The monitoring must be daily by the physician.
For grades 3/4 (Severe or life threatening): defined as any of the following
>50% skin surface, generalised , exfoliative, ulcerative or bullous dermatitis
The severe skin AE require immediate interruption of ICIs, until these are back to grade 1. Treatment includes topical emollients cream, oral antihistamines and high strength topical steroids . Systemic corticosteroids 0.5–1 mg/kg can be considered, depending on the severity of the symptoms. Patients should be need urgently a biopsy for confirmation of diagnosis and admitted to intensive care unit for monitoring. Treatment consists of high dose intravenous corticosteroids (methyl prednisolone 1–2mg/kg with tapering when the toxicity resolves to grade1. We must not forget IV antibiotics if patient had signs of infection.
If symptoms resolve or improve to grade 2: discontinuation of immunotherapy must be permanent and we initiate corticosteroid taper over ≥2 months [2,27].
CONCLUSION
Immunotherapy is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs).Skin irAEs are among the most frequent toxicities observed within the first few weeks after initiation of ICIs. Severe cutaneous lesions can become life-threatening that’s why oncologists must know how to recognize these lesions and refer the patient to the dermatologis. These dermatological toxicities can be managed effectively by using established international guidelines
Conflit of Interest
None
Reference
- Nadia Salinas, Emmanuel Nowak, Maxime Etienne, Delphine Legoupil, Maxime Fouchard, et al. (2021) Causes of Pruritus in Patients Treated with Immune Check point Inhibitors for Melanomas or Skin Carcinomas. Frontiers in Medicine 8: 632683.
- Haanen JBAG, Carbonnel F, Robert C, Kerr KM, Peters S, et al. (2017) on behalf of the ESMO Guidelinaes Committee Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up 28: 4.
- Di Giacomo AM, Biagioli M, Maio M (2010) The emerging toxicity profiles of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies across clinical indications. Semin Oncol 37: 499-507.
- Boutros C, Tarhini A, Routier E, Lambotte O, Ladurie FL, et al. (2016) Safety profiles of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies alone and in combination. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 13 : 473-486.
- Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, Atkins MB, Brassil KJ, et al. (2018) Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy : American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 36: 1714-1768.
- Tison A, Quéré G, Misery L, Funck-Brentano E, Danlos FX, et al. (2019) Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer and preexisting autoimmune disease: a nationwide, multicentercohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol 71: 2100-2111.
- Ensslin CJ, Rosen AC, Wu S, Lacouture ME (2013) Pruritus in patients treated with targeted cancer therapies: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 69: 708-720.
- Wu J, Lacouture ME (2018) Pruritus associated with targeted anticancer therapies and their management. Dermatol Clin 36: 315-324.
- Lacouture ME, Wolchok JD, Yosipovitch G (2014) Ipilimumab in patients with cancer and the management of dermatologic adverse events. J Am Acad Dermatol 71: 161-169.
- Sibaud V, Meyer N, Lamant L (2016) Dermatologic complications of anti- PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint antibodies. Curr Opin Oncol 28:254-263.
- Fife BT, Bluestone JA (2008) Control of peripheral T-cell tolerance and autoimmunity via the CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways. Immunol Rev 224: 166-182.
- Squibb BM. Yervoy (2019) U.S.Food and Drug Administration.
- Ian William Tattersall, Jonathan Scott Leventhal (2020) Cutaneous Toxicities of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Role of the Dermatologist. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 93: 123-132.
- Regeneron (2019) Libtayo (Cemiplimab) [package insert]. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
- Chunxia He, Tao Qu (2020) Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cutaneous adverseevents. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol 16: e149-e153.
- Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF (2010) Improved survival withipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 363(8): 711-723.
- Eggermont AMM, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob JJ (2015) Adjuvant ipilimumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma (EORTC 18071): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 16(5): 522-530.
- Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV (2015) Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 372(26): 2521-2532.
- Raschi E, Antonazzo IC, La Placa M, Ardizzoni A, Poluzzi E, et al. (2019) Serious cutaneous toxicities with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system. Oncologist 24(11): e1228-e1231.
- Phillips GS, Freites-Martinez A, Wu J, Chan D, Fabbrocini G, et al. (2018) Clinical characterization of immunotherapy-related pruritus among patients seen in 2 oncodermatology clinics. JAMA Dermatol 155: 249-251.
- Hassel JC, Heinzerling L, Aberle J, Bahr O, Eigentler TK, et al. (2017) Combined immune checkpoint blockade(anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4): Evaluation and management of adverse drug reactions. Cancer Treat Rev 57: 36-49.
- Hwang SJ, Carlos G, Wakade D, Byth K, Kong BY, et al. (2016) Cutaneous adverse events (AEs) of anti-programmedcell death (PD)-1 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma: A single-institution cohort. J Am Acad Dermatol 74(3): 455-461.
- Sanlorenzo M, Vujic I, Daud A, Algazi A, Gubens M, et al. (2015) Pembrolizumab Cutaneous Adverse Events and their Association with Disease Progression. JAMA Dermatol 151(11): 1206-1212.
- Larkin J, Chiarion Sileni V, Gonzalez R (2015) Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 373: 23-34.
- Boutros C, Tarhini A, Routier E (2016) Safety profiles of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies alone and in combination. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 13: 473-486.
- Belum VR, Benhuri B, Postow MA (2016) Characterisation and management of dermatologic adverse events to agents targeting the PD-1 receptor.Eur J Cancer 60: 12-25.
- LANCASHIRE TEACHING HOSPTALS NHS TRUST. Management of Immunotherapy Induced Skin Toxicities.Adapted from Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology Immunotherapy Guidelines.
Recent Comments