Short Communication

Study and Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities and CH4 Changes in the Arctic Kongsfjorden, Svalbar

Fang Zhang* and Jianfeng He*

The Key Laboratory for Polar Science MNR, Polar Research Institute of China, Shanghai, China

Received Date: 29/03/2021; Published Date: 05/04/2021

*Corresponding author: Fang Zhang and Jianfeng He, The Key Laboratory for Polar Science MNR, Polar Research Institute of China, Shanghai, China

DOI: 10.46718/JBGSR.2021.08.000192

Cite this article: Fang Zhang* and Jianfeng He*. Study and Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities and CH₄ Changes in the Arctic Kongsfjorden, Svalbard.

Abstract

The fast Arctic warming is having a profound impact on prokaryotes as the basis of microbial food loop. However, we still do not know much of these microbes, especieally their envieromental function and their envieromental regulation mechanisms in the high Arctic Kongsfjorden. All these have restricted our knowledge in prokaryotic feedback on climate and environmental change. As the second most greenhouse gas, methane (CH4) is sensitive to temperature changes; and seafloor hydrates are huge reservoirs of CH4. These CH4 are usually produced by prokaryotes. Despite the importance of both prokaryotes and CH4, we still know little about the activity of prokaryote community and their corellations with CH4 in Kongsfjorden. This paper is to make a comprehensive discription of research status in both prokaryotes and CH4 in the Arctic Kongsjorden. Several topics that need to study in future were put forward at the end of this paper.

Keywords: Arctic high latitude; Prokaryotes; Methane; Omics; High-through put sequencing

Short Communication

The Arctic Kongsfjorden (79°N, 12°E) is an inner bay on the northwest coast of Svalbard. Kongsfjorden is influenced by both North Atlantic Current and glacial melt water [1]. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the input of the warm Atlantic current [2]; its presence was detected of even in winter [3]. There has been non-icebound in winter in the past decade [4]. In addition, the stratification and salinity in the bottom of Kongsfjorden are increasing, which have a great impact on the biota there [5-7]. The sensitivity of Kongsfjorden to changes makes it an ideal place to study the effects of climate change on Arctic costal ecosystems [5,8].

Prokaryotes are important microbes in Kongsfjorden, which experience extreme temperature and seasonal light changes. Although the abundance of prokaryotes decreases from low to high latitudes, their abundance in Kongsfjorden is estimated to be about 108-109 cells/L [9]. Prokaryotes are key components of the marine microbial food loop; and their metabolic pathways play an important role in microbial circuits of biogeochemical processes such as the carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles [10]. In Kongsfjorden, about 19% of particulate organic carbon and 36% of particulate matter are composed of bacteria [11]. Prokaryotes are sensitive to environmental changes. However, they can also have a lasting impact on the microenvironment in which they live through the microphloretic and metabolic pathways, i.e., feedback to environmental changes [12,13]. During the summer of the peak melt season, large amounts of glacial melt water can change the community structure [14]. Because glacial melt water will bring a large number of glacial and terrestrial organic and inorganic substances into Kongsfjorden, so that the temperature and salt of the sea water decreases significantly, the seawater stratification increased, both the transmittance and euphotic layer of the sea water decreased. This leads to a negative effect of low temperature and osmotic pressure on the plankton individuals. The input of terrestrial organisms alters the original plankton community structure [15,16]. In addition, the increase of warm Atlantic water also led to an alteration of the prokaryotic community [17].

In Kongsfjorden, the core groups of prokaryotes are Verrucomicrobia and Bacteroidetes, whose community compositions are strongly affected by the content of carbohydrate in the particulate organic matter. However, the core groups of prokaryotes are α-Proteobacteria and γ-Proteobacteria, whose community composition is influenced by glacial melt water inflow and particulate organic carbon [16]. Bacteroidetes is the most abundant bacteria group in spring [18], while Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes are the dominant bacteria group in summer [19]. Our research shows that with the change of climate, Bacteroidetes is gradually replaced by Actinobacteria in summer. In summer, the prokaryotes in both water and sediments are mainly Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, and Actinobacteria [20]. Cyanobacteria are mainly present in glaciers, and enter Konsfjorden with glacial meltwater. Cyanobacteria are also found in the warm Atlantic water mass, although they belong to different species.

CH4 is second only to carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas that accelerates global warming [21]. Arctic seafloor hydrates are large CH4 reservoirs, which are highly sensitive to temperature [21,22]. These CH4 are usually formed by a microbiome-mediated process called Methanogenesis of CH4 [21], and were buried in sediments through long-term fermentation [21]. In surface sea water, CH4 formed in local anaerobic microenvironment (such as zooplankton gut, inside particles of copepod feces, etc.) also becomes an important source of CH4 in seawater and atmosphere [23-25], these CH4 are ultimately produced by prokaryotes. Cyanobacteria with nitrogen fixation were also strongly associated with CH4.

Generally, there have been several studies on distribution of prokaryotic community and CH4 in Kongsjorden. For example, there is abundant CH4 in seabed of the Svalbard shelf, which has a certain response and feedback to climate changes. However, little is known about the activities of prokaryotic communities and their relationship with CH4, which makes it difficult to analyze the functions of prokaryotic communities in the production and consumption of CH4, thus not knowing their accurate role in climate and environmental changes. The 16S rRNA and methyl-coenzyme M-reductase (mCRA) genes of prokaryotes (bacteria/archaea) in seawater and sediments from Kosfjorden were quantitatively analyzed [21,26], combined with isotopic methods [27], sources and exports of CH4 can be effectively traced to assess the impact of environmental changes in coastal waters on CH4 production and release. Progresses in technology, especially in high-throughput sequencing of omics (metagenomics, metabtranscriptome, and metabolomics) have enabled us to better understand the environmental functions of different groups of prokaryotes. Therefore, in the face of increasingly significant global changes (glacier melting, permafrost melting, etc.), it is urgent to study the mechanism of CH4 migration and transformation and its relationship with prokaryotes in Kongsfjroden. On the basis of the existing studies, we need to further answer the following questions:

With the rapid warming of the Arctic and the total environmental changes of Ny-Alesund, how will the composition of the prokaryotic community in Kongsfjorden change? How do the living and active populations change, and what are their internal correlations?

What is the proportion of CH4 contributed by prokaryotes in the coastal marine ecosystem?

How does the rapid warming of the Arctic affect the composition of prokaryotic communities in seawater and sediments of Kongsfjorden, and thus the change of CH4? What are the implications for global change?

 

*Corresponding author: Fang Zhang and Jianfeng He, Email: zhangfang@pric.org.cn; hejianfeng@pric.org.cn

References

  1. Cottier F, Tverberg V, Inall ME, Svendsen H, Nilsen F, et al. (2005) Water mass modification in an Arctic fjord through cross-shelf exchange: the seasonal hydrography hydrography of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard 102: 110.
  2. Cottier FR, Nilsen F, Skogseth R, Tverberg V, Skarehamar J, et al. (2010) Arctic fjords: a review of the oceanographic environment and dominant physical processes Geol Soc London, Spec. Publ 344: 35-50.
  3. Cottier FR, Nilsen F, Inall ME, Gerland S, Tverberg V, et al. (2007) Wintertime warming of an Arctic shelf in response to large-scale atmospheric circulation. Geophys Res Lett 34: L10607.
  4. Muckenhuber S, Korosov AA, Sandven S (2016) Open-source feature-tracking algorithm for sea ice drift retrieval from Sentinel-1 SAR imagery. The Cryosphere 10(2): 913-925.
  5. Wiencke C, Hop H (2016) Ecosystem Kongsfjorden: new views after more than a decade of research. Polar Biology  39(10): 1679-1687.
  6. Lalande C, Moriceau B, Leynaert A (2017) Spatial and temporal variability in export fluxes of biogenic matter in Kongsfjorden. Polar Biology 39(10): 1-14.
  7. Bischof K, Convey P, Duarte P. Kongsfjorden as Harbinger of the Future Arctic: Knowns, Unknowns and Research Priorities, In H. Hop, C. Wiencke (eds.), The Ecosystem of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, Advances in Polar Ecology 2.
  8. Hop H, Falk-Petersen S, Svendsen H (2006) Physical and biological characteristics of the pelagic system across Fram Strait to Kongsfjorden. Progress in Oceanography 71(2–4): 182-231.
  9. Wang G, Guo C, Luo W, Cai M, He J (2009) The distribution of picoplankton and nanoplankton in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard during late summer 2006. Polar Biology 32: 1233-1238.
  10. Falkowski PG, Barber RT, Smetacek V (1998) Biogeochemical controls and feedbacks on ocean primary production. Science 281: 200–206
  11. Zhu ZY, Wu Y, Liu SM, Wenger F, Hu J, et al. (2016) Organic carbon flux and particulate organic matter composition in Arctic valley glaciers: examples from the Bayelva River and adjacent Kongsfjorden. Biogeosciences 13: 975-987.
  12. Doney SC, Ruckelshaus M, Duffy JE, Barry JP, Chan F, et al. (2012) Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. Annu Rev Mar Sci 4: 11-37.
  13. Sunagawa S, Coelho LP, Chaffron S, Kultima JR, Labadie K, et al.  (2015) Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 348: 126-135.
  14. Hegseth EN, Tverberg V (2013) Effect of Atlantic water inflow on timing of the phytoplankton spring bloom in a high Arctic fjord (Kongsfjorden, Svalbard). Journal of Marine Systems 113–114(1): 94-105.
  15. Jain A, Krishnan KP (2017) Diferences in free-living and particleassociated bacterial communities and their spatial variation in Kongsforden, Arctic. J Basic Microb 57(10): 827-838.
  16. Jain A, Krishnan KP, Singh A, Thomas FA, Begum N, et al. (2019) Biochemical composition of particles shape particle-attached bacterial community structure in a high Arctic ford. Ecol Indic 102: 581-592.
  17. Shunan Cao, Fang Zhang, Jianfeng He, Zhongqiang Ji, Qiming Zhou (2020) Water masses infuence bacterioplankton community structure in summer Kongsforden. Extremophiles 24: 107-120.
  18. Piquet AMT, Maat DS, Confurius-Guns V, Sintes E, Herndl GJ, et al. (2015) Springtime dynamics, productivity and activity of prokaryotes in two Arctic fords. Polar Biol 39: 1749-1763.
  19. Zeng YX, Zhang F, He JF, Lee SH, Qiao ZY, et al. (2013) Bacterioplankton community structure in the Arctic waters as revealed by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes. Anton Leeuw Int J G 103: 1309-1319.
  20. Feng M, Zhang W, Xiao T (2014) Spatial and temporal distribution of tintinnid (Ciliophora: Tintinnida) communities in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard (Arctic), during summer. Polar Biology 37(2): 291-296.
  21. Altshuler I, Hamel J, Turney S, Magnuson E, Lévesque R, et al. (2016) Variation of phytoplankton assemblages of Kongsfjorden in early autumn 2012: a microscopic and pigment ratio-based assessment. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment 188(4): 1-13.
  22. Damm E, Mackensen A, Budéus G, Faber E, Hanfland C. Pathways of methane in seawater: Plume spreading in an Arctic shelf environment (SW-Spitsbergen). Cont Shelf Res  25(12): 1453-1472.
  23. Karl DM, Tilbrook BD (1994) Production and transport of methane in oceanic particulate organic matter. Nature 368(6473): 732-734.
  24. Stawiarski B, Otto S, Thiel V, Gräwe U, Loick-Wilde N, et al. (2019) Controls on zooplankton methane production in the central Baltic Sea. Biogeosciences 16(1): 1-16.
  25. Shakirov RB, Mau S, Mishukova GI, Obzhirov AI, Shakirova MV, et al. (2020) The features of methane fluxes in the western and eastern Artcic: A review. Part I. Geosystems of Transition Zones 4(1): 4-25.
  26. Wāge J, Schmale O, Labrenz M (2020) Quantification of methanogenic Archaea within Baltic Sea copepod faecal pellets. Mar. Biol 167(10): 1-7.
  27. Bižić M, Klintzsch T, Ionescu D, Hindiyeh MY, Günthel M, et al. (2020) Aquatic and terrestrial cyanobacteria produce methane. Science Advances 6(3): eaax5343.
TOP